Contract operations beyond a renewal calendar
Keep agreements, obligations, owners, and decisions connected.
PactControl gives operations teams one controlled view of agreement metadata, obligations, review work, renewals, evidence, and portfolio exposure.
The PactControl platform
One working system for the whole operation.
Each module answers a different question. Together they give the team a shared record of what exists, what needs attention, who decides, and what happened next.
Agreements
Maintain a structured inventory of confirmed agreement facts and source references.
Obligations
Track buyer-confirmed obligations, owners, periods, and completion state.
Owners
Make commercial, operational, and legal responsibility explicit for each record.
Renewals
Work backward from confirmed dates so decisions happen before notice pressure.
Review queue
Route ambiguous facts and consequential choices to the right qualified person.
Portfolio analytics
See workload, gaps, and upcoming decision windows across the portfolio.
Where the work gets stuck
The system is rarely the whole problem.
For small businesses managing 50–1,000 vendor and customer contracts without a legal-ops team.
Signed contracts become dead PDFs while operational commitments move into inboxes and calendars.
Broad CLM projects add seats, change management, and administration before basic metadata is trustworthy.
Extraction demos look clean on sample files but real agreements arrive as long, multilingual, multi-file packages.
Contract Register Management · managed delivery
A searchable contract register with confirmed dates, owners, and obligations.
We keep the records, definitions, checks, exceptions, and review pack moving across the six-module model. Your team keeps every decision that carries financial, legal, operational, or customer impact.
- Counterparty, owner, dates, and obligations with page citations
- Human confirmation for every legally meaningful field
- A portable register rather than a locked-in repository
Evaluate the product
Everything you need to decide whether this fits.
Explore the application model, exact deliverable, input boundary, rollout, and trade-offs before you share operational data.
Product tour
Move through all six modules in a realistic workspace built with fictional data.
02Capabilities
See the repeatable work behind every operating cycle.
03Sample deliverable
Walk through the reviewable output your team receives.
04Implementation
See the four checkpoints, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.
05Data requirements
Review the accepted fields, excluded data, and handling lifecycle.
06Full FAQ
Get direct answers on capacity, switching, security, and service boundaries.
How it works
A complete operating view without a drawn-out rollout.
Start with the working records you already have. We map them into the connected model, run the review cycle, and improve the control record with your team.
- 1Step 1
Start with ten representative signed agreements, including the messy ones.
- 2Step 2
Review the extracted register and source pages with the business owner.
- 3Step 3
Receive the confirmed register, exception log, and import-ready export.
Why we work this way
We started with the complaints, not a feature list.
Public operator discussions showed us where existing tools create extra work. Those recurring problems now shape the service and every client deliverable.
Salesforce · Contract-management systems
A legal operator said tools still need technical administration and disciplined adoption; parallel intake through email and multiple tools created duplication, misses, and confusion.
What we changed: Avoid a broad rollout, return portable data, and route confirmed obligations into tools the business already uses.
Read the source notesIronclad · ContractWorks · Jira · Notion
Operators described post-signature work splitting across CLM, email, finance, tickets, calendars, and spreadsheets, with ownership handoffs and quietly expiring rights as brittle points.
What we changed: Focus on source-backed terms, accountable owners, and a decision timeline that syncs outward rather than replacing the repository.
Read the source notesRenlu · Spreadsheet trackers
A trial user found limits with long, multilingual, multi-file agreements and reported failed extraction for the real-world contract package.
What we changed: Fit-test with messy representative agreements, preserve file relationships, and flag unsupported extraction instead of offering false certainty.
Read the source notesUseful before you hire us
Put the workflow into a register your team can actually run.
The contract register field guide is a five-tab Excel workbook with a ready-to-fill register, worked fictional example, weekly review agenda, and metric dictionary.
Download the Excel workbook- 01Capture owner, counterparty, effective date, term, renewal, and notice window
- 02Attach a page citation to every extracted term
- 03Record confidence and reviewer confirmation separately
- 04Export confirmed data in a portable tabular format
Monthly service plans
Choose the plan that matches the workload.
Every plan is a month-to-month managed service with a generous, published capacity, a named cadence, and human review. The middle plan is the practical fit for most teams. Prices are in US dollars and exclude applicable sales tax.
Our promiseNo annual contract or repository migration. Unreadable or ambiguous terms are flagged for confirmation, never silently guessed. We take on no more than 5 new clients at a time, so every delivery gets a human review.
Compare the detailsStart with fit
Tell us where the work gets stuck.
Share the situation in general terms. We will review it personally and tell you which plan fits. No card or operational files are needed.
The practical details
Questions people ask before we start.
Does this replace a lawyer?+
No. PactControl organizes facts and evidence; legal interpretation and decisions remain with authorized people.
Do we have to move our files?+
No. The service returns a portable register and does not require repository migration.
What about complex contract packages?+
Multi-file, multilingual, or unusually large agreements are identified during fit review and may sit outside the published plan capacity.
How is extraction verified?+
Every material field includes a source-page reference and a human confirmation state.
What do we receive each cycle?+
A human-reviewed source-linked contract register, the supporting exception log, and the plan-specific review cadence shown on the pricing page.
What do you need from us?+
A named owner, the agreed definitions, and ten representative signed agreements through an agreed secure exchange. The public inquiry form accepts none of that operational data.