Your signed agreements, turned into accountable work

Know what every contract requires—without a full CLM rollout.

Build a confirmed register of counterparties, owners, key dates, and obligations from signed agreements, with source-page evidence for every extracted term.

No card or migration Fixed-scope pilot Human-confirmed decisions
A small operations team reviewing a clear workflow together
Venthry ContractsPilot view
Current focusA searchable contract register and confirmed obligationsEvidence first · human confirmed
01
Counterparty, owner, dates, and obligations with page citationsReady for review
Priority
02
Human confirmation for every legally meaningful fieldOwner assigned
Tracked
03
A portable register rather than a locked-in repositoryEvidence linked
Tracked
Read-only pilotUpdated just now
Early-access validation, openly stated.A small software studio building focused operations tools. This is a genuinely delivered pilot—not a claim that finished software already exists.

Why this exists

Built around the work competitors leave behind.

Small businesses managing 50–1,000 vendor and customer contracts without a legal-ops team.

01

Signed contracts become dead PDFs while operational commitments move into inboxes and calendars.

02

Broad CLM projects add seats, change management, and administration before basic metadata is trustworthy.

03

Extraction demos look clean on sample files but real agreements arrive as long, multilingual, multi-file packages.

The focused promise

A searchable contract register and confirmed obligations timeline that stays outside legal judgment.

We deliberately keep judgment, authorization, and consequential decisions with your team. The pilot automates the legwork that can be made observable and repeatable.

  • Counterparty, owner, dates, and obligations with page citations
  • Human confirmation for every legally meaningful field
  • A portable register rather than a locked-in repository
Venthry ContractsPilot view
Current focusA searchable contract register and confirmed obligationsEvidence first · human confirmed
01
Counterparty, owner, dates, and obligations with page citationsReady for review
Priority
02
Human confirmation for every legally meaningful fieldOwner assigned
Tracked
03
A portable register rather than a locked-in repositoryEvidence linked
Tracked
Read-only pilotUpdated just now

Fast path to evidence

Useful before it becomes software.

One bounded workflow. Real output. A clear go/no-go decision.

  1. 1
    Step 1

    Start with ten representative signed agreements, including the messy ones.

  2. 2
    Step 2

    Review the extracted register and source pages with the business owner.

  3. 3
    Step 3

    Receive the confirmed register, exception log, and import-ready export.

Hard boundary: No legal advice, redlining, autonomous interpretation, signature workflow, privilege guarantee, or claim that AI review replaces counsel.

Competitor-review intelligence

Recurring friction became product requirements.

We reviewed dated public operator discussions, preserved the caveats, and converted the repeated pain into design choices. No scraped review-marketplace content and no invented testimonials.

Salesforce · Contract-management systems

A legal operator said tools still need technical administration and disciplined adoption; parallel intake through email and multiple tools created duplication, misses, and confusion.

Our response: Avoid a broad rollout, return portable data, and route confirmed obligations into tools the business already uses.

See evidence and caveat

Ironclad · ContractWorks · Jira · Notion

Operators described post-signature work splitting across CLM, email, finance, tickets, calendars, and spreadsheets, with ownership handoffs and quietly expiring rights as brittle points.

Our response: Focus on source-backed terms, accountable owners, and a decision timeline that syncs outward rather than replacing the repository.

See evidence and caveat

Renlu · Spreadsheet trackers

A trial user found limits with long, multilingual, multi-file agreements and reported failed extraction for the real-world contract package.

Our response: Fit-test with messy representative agreements, preserve file relationships, and flag unsupported extraction instead of offering false certainty.

See evidence and caveat

Reciprocity, with something genuinely useful

Take the checklist, even if we never work together.

The contract register field guide is a practical starting point for improving this workflow today.

Download free CSV
  1. 01Capture owner, counterparty, effective date, term, renewal, and notice window
  2. 02Attach a page citation to every extracted term
  3. 03Record confidence and reviewer confirmation separately
  4. 04Export confirmed data in a portable tabular format

Design-partner offer

Contract Register Audit

€450 for 10 contracts

Expected plan: €99/month for 250 active contracts. Future pricing is a hypothesis, not a payment commitment.

  • Counterparty, owner, dates, and obligations with page citations
  • Human confirmation for every legally meaningful field
  • A portable register rather than a locked-in repository
  • Direct access to the small Venthry team

Plain-English risk reversalNo migration commitment. Unreadable or ambiguous terms are flagged for confirmation, never silently guessed.

Request one of 5 pilot reviews Five design-partner slots are planned for this offer. Availability is confirmed only after fit review; this page does not show a fake live counter.

Small first commitment

See if the pilot fits.

Reserve a nonbinding fit review. No card, operational files, credentials, or customer data belong in this form. We reply personally with the next safe step.

Questions, answered plainly

No hidden implementation story.

Does this replace a lawyer?+

No. Venthry organizes facts and evidence; legal interpretation and decisions remain with authorized people.

Do we have to move our files?+

No. The pilot returns a portable register and does not require repository migration.

What about complex contract packages?+

Multi-file, multilingual, or unusually large agreements are identified during fit review and may be excluded from the fixed pilot.

How is extraction verified?+

Every material field includes a source-page reference and a human confirmation state.